Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Bush threatens Cuba ... with what?

George Bush plans to issue a stern warning to Cuba that the United States won't accept a political transition from one Castro brother to another. The only problem with this is Bush is a little late -- the transfer is pretty much done.

The New York Times reports:

As described by an official in a background briefing to reporters on Tuesday evening, Mr. Bush’s remarks will amount to the most detailed response — mainly an unbending one — to the political changes that began in Cuba more than a year ago, when Fidel Castro fell ill and handed power to his brother Raúl. [...]

[Bush] will say that while much of the rest of Latin America has moved from dictatorship to democracy, Cuba continues to use repression and terror to control its people. And, the administration official said, Mr. Bush will direct another part of his speech to the Cuban people, telling them they “have the power to shape their destiny and bring about change.” [...]

Some of the sharpest parts of the speech, however, will be aimed directly at Raúl Castro. Mr. Bush is expected to make clear that the United States will oppose an old system controlled by new faces. The senior administration official said that nothing in Raúl Castro’s past gives Washington reason to expect democratic reforms soon. And he said the United States would uphold its tough economic policies against the island.

Because they have worked so well up to now! But wait, there's more.

Phil Peters, an expert on Cuba at the non-partisan Lexington Institute, said he saw Mr. Bush’s speech as an attempt to reorient a policy that had fallen behind the times. American policy, he said, had been centered around the idea that the Communist government would fall once Mr. Castro left power, and that Mr. Castro, 81, would be forced out of power only by death. Instead, Mr. Peters said, Raúl Castro’s rise caught the administration off guard.

President Bush has remained largely silent, Mr. Peters said, while Raúl Castro consolidated his control over Cuban institutions by establishing his own relationships with world leaders, and opening unprecedented dialogue with the Cuban people about their visions for their own country. Meanwhile, all the doomsday scenarios predicted for Cuba once Fidel Castro left power — a violent uprising by dissidents and a huge exodus of Cuban refugees — never materialized.

“The administration realized they had missed the boat,” Mr. Peters said. “Succession has already happened. They can no longer have a policy that keeps them waiting for Castro to die when the rest of the world has moved on.”
Bush and Condi are certainly on top of this one! Bush's comments will no doubt play well with "the politically-powerful exile community in Miami." But for what purpose? One has to wonder what Bush has up his sleeve?

Whatever it is, 2009 can't come too soon for me!

3 comments:

Fran said...

You know, wtf is his problem?

Like, duh, it was over a year ago? He is like some crazy ass old impotent dictator. Which is how he'd like us to see Fidel, but is more like how Bush is.

Is there a point to this? Ugh. I don't want to know. I just want a new president. And a better one!

Jess Wundrun said...

The best way to completely destabilize Cuba right now would be to remove all sanctions and have the government underwrite $99 airfares for US tourists to Havana.

Seriously. Since the fall of the Soviet Union Cuba has become an incubator for sustainability science. Our locavores and organic farmers could learn a lot from what the Cubans were forced to learn. Cuba is essentially corporate-free and they are getting stronger every year rather than falling apart. (This is a daily living screed, not a political one).

So if we opened the doors and let Archers Daniel Midland and Sandals Resorts in, Cuba would suddenly be flung back to 1958 all over again.

I hope the president doesn't read your blog. I don't want to give him any ideas.

joshhill1021 said...

Jess that is a great idea. If the borders were suddenly opened, the Cuban economy would be so overwhelmed that it would probably collapse.

Also, how stupid is this administration saying that they did not know that Raul would take over power when Castro died or left power? I worked for a Latin American think tank in DC for a summer while I was in college, I believe it was the summer of 2000, and it was generally known and accepted that Raul would just take over power. Now Raul is no spring chicken and when he can no longer rule it may become interesting, but Fidel to Castro was just plain expected.