A review of classified documents by former members of the Sept. 11 commission shows that the panel made repeated and detailed requests to the Central Intelligence Agency in 2003 and 2004 for documents and other information about the interrogation of operatives of Al Qaeda, and were told by a top C.I.A. official that the agency had “produced or made available for review” everything that had been requested.
The review was conducted earlier this month after the disclosure that in November 2005, the C.I.A. destroyed videotapes documenting the interrogations of two Qaeda operatives.
A seven-page memorandum prepared by Philip D. Zelikow, the panel’s former executive director, concluded that “further investigation is needed” to determine whether the C.I.A.’s withholding of the tapes from the commission violated federal law.
In interviews this week, the two chairmen of the commission, Lee H. Hamilton and Thomas H. Kean, said their reading of the report had convinced them that the agency had made a conscious decision to impede the Sept. 11 commission’s inquiry. [...]
A C.I.A. spokesman said that the agency had been prepared to give the Sept. 11 commission the interrogation videotapes, but that commission staff members never specifically asked for interrogation videos.
The review by Mr. Zelikow does not assert that the commission specifically asked for videotapes, but it quotes from formal requests by the commission to the C.I.A. that sought “documents,” “reports” and “information” related to the interrogations.
Mr. Kean, a Republican and a former governor of New Jersey, said of the agency’s decision not to disclose the existence of the videotapes, “I don’t know whether that’s illegal or not, but it’s certainly wrong.” Mr. Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, said that the C.I.A. “clearly obstructed” the commission’s investigation.
3 comments:
BAC, apparently it is. It's a sad commentary about our country when this type of activity is apparently given a free pass. Yet, heaven forbid someone we3 let a moment pass without the latest on Brittney or Jamie Lynn. Help us all if urgent matters of state preempts the latest episode of The Amazing Race. Haven't you learned that impeachments are boring unless they're for lying about blow jobs.
... I keep forgetting that ... thanks for the reminder.
BAC
Yeah Spartacus, haven't decades under semi-puritanical rule taught us anything: Sex bad, violence good. As for prosecutions here, unfortunately I don't think it will do us much good - Tenent will be further villified, might face prosecution and have a jail sentence commuted by the "Decider" probably right after he vetoes the next SCHIP bill... If this administration has shown us one thing, it's how to create a fall guy.
Can someone just wake me up when it's November 4?
Post a Comment