Contrary to what the Bush administration would have you believe, abstinence-only education doesn't seem to be working. We've heard this before, and now there is yet another study that seems to confirm it.The birth rate among teenagers 15 to 19 in the United States rose 3 percent in 2006, according to a report issued Wednesday, the first such increase since 1991. The finding surprised scholars and fueled a debate about whether the Bush administration’s abstinence-only sexual education efforts are working.
The federal government spends $176 million annually on such programs. But a landmark study recently failed to demonstrate that they have any effect on delaying sexual activity among teenagers, and some studies suggest that they may actually increase pregnancy rates.
“Spending tens of million of tax dollars each year on programs that hurt our children is bad medicine and bad public policy,” said Dr. David A. Grimes, vice president of Family Health International, a nonprofit reproductive health organization based in North Carolina.
Robert Rector, a senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, said that blaming abstinence-only programs was “stupid.” Mr. Rector said that most young women who became pregnant were highly educated about contraceptives but wanted to have babies.
... that teenage and unmarried birth rates were driven by the same factors: young women with little education who are devoted to mothering but see no great need to be married.
3 comments:
Frank discussions and birth control seem to be the better alternatives here.
Seem to be? ARE!
In my wife's an my case, having a baby brother when you are in high school is also a good deterrent. Nothing like seeing what it's really like to raise a baby to keep you from wanting to have one any time soon...
Fran, it's just too bad you aren't running things!
John, I guess it would!
BAC
Post a Comment