We had a rough day yesterday to be sure. I finally called it a day around 1am and as I was clearing out the dishes hubby left in the sink (sigh, again) I paused for a minute - leaned on the sink and thought... how in the HELL does Hillary keep on going in the face of the hate, the anger, the unfair media coverage, the sexism, and - tonight especially – this latest disappointment?Alegre ends her post by saying: "I plan to stand by her every step of the way – and I know I won’t be standing alone."
What drives this sister with the heart of a lioness?
Getting back into the White House?
Nooooo. She’s been there before.
Receiving more adulation and love from the MSM & the press (Tweety & Russert)? Hardly!
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that she is the very definition of a public servant. She sees how much work there is to be done and she knows she’s the one person who’ll actually get results. She’s got a long history of public service and sticking up for those without a voice.
Over the summer I attended a state-wide meeting of volunteers, and a woman from Hillary’s staff mentioned something that really stuck with me. She said they were getting Hillary ready for a debate and there was this briefing book full of the things she’d accomplished in her career. That book was 312 pages long (single spaced)!
No I won’t list everything here, but take a look at a few little known facts about her record...As a law student Hillary worked to identify children who were victims of abuse and neglect and volunteered at the New Haven Legal Services offices. Her first job out of law school was going door-to-door with the Children's Defense Fund to find out why children weren’t enrolled in public schools. Her findings prompted Congress to pass laws ensuring that kids with disabilities were accommodated and taught in our public schools (setting up programs in which my son and countless others have benefited enormously).She could have gone back into private life when she and Bill left the White House. It would have been easy and she could have gotten a job that paid a boatload of money with her mind, intellect and background. Any law firm, foundation or University would have jumped at the chance to put her name on their letterhead.
When Reagan was President, Hillary was Chairman of the Legal Services corporation - legal services for the poor. In a head-to-head battle with the President, she successfully fought Reagan off when he tried to shift $300 million legal services to defense spending.
In Arkansas Hillary ran the University of Arkansas's legal aid and prison projects; reformed Arkansas' education system; instituted a model parent education program; created new scholarships for single parents; and expanded medical facilities in Arkansas' poorest areas.
As First Lady Hillary helped create the State Children's Health Insurance Program; spearheaded efforts to double child care spending, dramatically expand Head Start, and create Early Head Start; and expanded the federal after school program to a $1 billion formula grant program that reaches every state.
But she didn’t. She wanted to keep doing what she does best – helping folks as a public servant.
But instead she thought "I still have work to do on behalf of the people of this world" and she realized she could continue her work as a Senator from NY. So she put together a campaign staff, rolled up her sleeves, put on her boots and took her message to the people of NY. She even headed up state when the "experts" told her not to bother.
Six years later she ran for and won re-election with 67% of the vote. She could have won re-election without the margin of victory in the City - that's how much the folks upstate (the people she was told to write off) loved, respected and trusted her. And they still do.
She’s done a great job for her state and for the people of this nation from that post...Hillary created a teacher recruitment program to bring outstanding teachers into low-income communities.
She sponsored legislation to grow childcare funding to $11.2 billion.
She fought off dramatic cuts to Medicaid and SCHIP.
She passed legislation with Lindsay Graham for expanded health services for military families.
She made sure that six million children have health insurance through the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
She fought for and won health benefits for our troops in the National Guard and Reserves.
She fought to preserve combat pay for injured National Guard and Reserve soldiers and passed a law establishing health tracking for returning soldiers.
She passed the Kids Car and Safety Act.
She successfully stopped efforts by the FDA to keep Plan B off the market.
She led the effort to get rid of the head of the FDA.
She held the Senate's first committee ever on environmental justice.
She fought to extend unemployment benefits, and won.
She successfully advocated for education reform.
She fought to make abortion safe, legal and rare.
She wrote and secured passage of legislation to assist family caregivers in accessing affordable and high quality respite care.
She fought to make sure the medicines we give our children are safe.
She was the first US Senator to label what was happening in Darfur genocide.
Her work on behalf of the environment and the health of first responders after 9/11 is nothing short of heroic.
She fought for and got enhanced body armor for our troops.
She got the Pentagon to respond to the Congress in terms of planning for Iraq withdrawal. The list goes on.
You certainly won't!
9 comments:
Excellent post!
Not to re-hash the earlier thread on this subject, but good lord! If this woman can't elected what are our chances of ever electing a woman?
Okay. She walks on water, and she's left of Obama on a lot of issues. So why does she still leave me cold?
SueJ - I know!
Nan - Maybe because you don't know her.
BAC
Hi BAC!
I have not been around so much this week.
You know that like Nan, I have issues with her and honestly, I do feel like I know her.
I know her and I respect her work. She is my senator- although for the record, I was furious that she missed the telecom immunity vote last week and called her office to voice my displeasure.
Sorry to go off topic. In general I respect a lot of what she has done, but not all.
He leaves me cold too so it is not a "him vs. her" thing here.
Today on Morning Edition I did hear a piece that was pretty compelling in her favor, but I am too lazy to link to it right now, having that kind of day.
Anyway, I do so love your tireless support and enthusiasm but I can't get there myself.
This is by no means a plea to get you to convince me. I have read, studied, pondered and even prayed. I watch, I listen, I am well informed.
My inner compass goes nowhere. It makes me sad and frustrated.
Deep sigh from FranIam.
Fran - You know I adore you, so I won't be spamming your mail box with vote Hillary material. It's hard to say why some people really like her (like me), and some don't.
A good friend of mine in NH has a daily radio program, and interviewed Hillary before the primary. My friend looks at everyone with a bit of a skeptical eye, but she emailed me following the interview and said "wow, she charmed the pants off me!" Now I don't think she meant that literally, for anyone who might be trolling this blog ... ha ... but you know what I mean.
I have heard Hillary speak on more than on occasion (before she became a candidate), and I always just liked what she had to say!
That becomes the question to ponder ... how can two very liberal, and intelligent women (you and me), have such a different take on the same person?
BAC
I have a theory on that, BAC, for which I may get some grief, but here goes:
Hillary Clinton is also a "very liberal and intelligent woman," yet she is also a politician. And I think maybe the politician side of her turns off many women who would otherwise stand with her. It takes a massive ego, to say the least, for someone to think they can be President of the United States. And I think many women are turned off by that side of Hillary Clinton.
And that's the rub: Any person -- man or woman -- has to have an enormous ego to go through all this campaign nonsense and to wield the power of the White House (note: of course, intelligence not necessarily required with the ego; see: George W. Bush).
But if we won't accept ego in a woman as talented as Clinton, will we ever accept it in a woman?
These are such good points. I am inclined to vote for Obama at this time (and, I am to vote here in Texas this week- early voting,) but I do admire Clinton's public service record very much and agree that there is a double standard in politics (and so many other places) that depict the same qualities that would be tolerable in a male (politician) as abhorant in a female (one.) I completely agree that that is occurring here, but it is hard for me to get past the idea that I prefer for people to not be throwing the jabs at eachother. In that way, I think that Obama doesn't stoop to the previous low level of politics as usual, the jabs, cutting down opponents rather than talking about the issues (while I also know that's what it has taken to win in the past.) As far as voting records go, where there are differences, I think they have evened out between this issue or that to make them seem comparable to eachother in that way. Obama is also a public servant, he's just younger, with less under his belt. This is where things are most ironic to me: this aspect, this key difference between the two of them, his lesser experience that Clinton really played up early on is biting her in the butt, becuase less experience in the current status quo (along with his completel competence) seems to be Obama's biggest appeal.
Freida Bee - I appreciate your comments and would add only one thing. On the debate stage Obama made a point of saying the discussion about "words" was "silly." At the end of the debate it was Hillary Clinton who extended a hand in friendship to Barack Obama ... and then minutes after the debate ended Obama issues a press release talking about how Hillary had lifted words from John Edwards. If it was "silly" for Clinton to have done this, and Obama wants to get away from this kind of politics, then why -- WITHIN MINUTES -- did he do EXACTLY what he deemed "silly"??
In my opinion he can't have it both ways -- particularly when Sen. Clinton sent the message "I got it."
BAC
And SueJ, I think you are on to something with this. Thanks.
BAC
Post a Comment