Shamelessly stolen from Tennessee Guerilla Women:
In a must-read piece in the Wall Street Journal, Jonathan Kaufman and Carol Hymowitz provide a compelling snapshot of the feminist consciousness raising project that IS Hillary Rodham Clinton's bid for the presidency. The piece includes depressing facts about the dismal status of women's equality. And it is a narrative of the reaction of women to the ongoing malevolent national sexist backlash to the very idea of a woman as Commander-in-Chief. You should read it all, but here are some snippets:
Valerie Benjamin, a human-resources manager for a consulting firm here, was driving to work recently in her red minivan with a Hillary bumper sticker when a man pulled up alongside and rolled down his window. "You can be for Hillary all you want," he shouted, "but there is no way that thing is going to become president."
"I couldn't believe this guy was shouting at me in my car," says Ms. Benjamin. "I am continuously surprised by the level of venom."
An hour away in Indiana, Pa., a working-class town, Jill Fiore, who teaches part-time at a local college and has a doctorate in English, says she constantly has to remind students to call her "Dr. Fiore" -- the same way they address male professors -- rather than "Jill" or "Mrs. Fiore." Unable to get a full-time college teaching job, she made just $8,000 last year cobbling together part-time work, and she recently decided to open a yoga business."
The sexism aimed at Hillary is astounding me," she says. "We want to let our daughters know that we can be anything. It's a lie. If even Hillary Clinton can't make it, what chance do we have?"
Exit polls indicate that Sen. Clinton has run strongest among working-class women and women in low-paying professional jobs such as nursing and teaching -- women who work on their feet, who often have faced wage discrimination and have struggled economically.
Katherine Putnam, president of Package Machinery Co., a West Springfield, Mass., equipment manufacturer, recalls that at a lunch she attended recently, a group of male chief executives "started talking about what an awful b---- Hillary was and how they'd never vote for her." She says she kept quiet. "I didn't want to jeopardize my relationship with them," she says. "But their remarks were a clear reminder that although I could sit there eating and drinking with them, and work with them, instinctively their reaction to me isn't positive."
"No one can say that the male vote is all gender-based," says Beth Brooke, global vice chair of strategy and regulatory affairs at Ernst & Young, and one of four women on the company's 21-person America's Executive Board. "But it reinforces among women of my generation the feeling that every day we walk in the door [at work], we are walking into an environment that is still biased. I'm feeling a tension I don't normally feel."
On March 5, the day after Sen. Clinton won Ohio, Jackie LeViseur, a fund-raiser at Youngstown State University, arrived at her office to find her female colleagues, mostly secretaries, high-fiving each other and cheering in the hall. The men, most of them bosses, remained in their offices, looking, says Ms. LeViseur, like their team had lost the football game.
Heather Arnet, a Clinton supporter who runs a Pittsburgh organization that lobbies for more women on public commissions and corporate boards, recently surveyed the Internet and found more than 50 anti-Hillary Clinton sites on Facebook. One of them, entitled "Hillary Clinton Stop Running for President and Make Me a Sandwich," had more than 38,000 members.
"What if one of these 38,000 guys is someone you, as a woman, have to go to and negotiate a raise?" she asks.
via Gawker: "Yes, men are going to start resisting equal rights for women. And that's a woman's fault too."
4 comments:
This whole campaign has only confirmed my fear that sexism is the strongest form of prejudice in the world. Beats racism, religion-based hatred, classism, and everything else I can think of.
It's just so damned depressing. It makes me want to go read Jill Johnston's Lesbian Nation again.
Since the population of adult women is greater than the population of adult men, when it comes to politics, there must be more than a few women who vote against the sisterhood.
Meanwhile, there's nothing to stop women from creating female-oriented opportunities. Why does it not happen?
There is no female Warren Buffett. He did not emerge from a background of male priviledge.
There is no female Bill Gates, or Michael Dell, or Henry Ford, or Hewlett or Packard.
No female Einstein, or Newton.
No female athletes able to compete with males.
From all this the only conclusion one can reach is that differences between genders exist. Do these differences matter in politics? Not in so far as actually performing in the role of elected official. But clearly gender matters in the minds of voters.
Meanwhile, Hillary is slightly behind Obama because she's Hillary. Not because she's female.
oh, odds-maker, no you didn't! I'm going to duck now, because I think you're about to get hammered ....
As he should, Sue! Clearly odds-maker has not studied his history.
Let's start with the obvious:
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
- Lord Acton
"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."
- Frederick Douglass
"We still think of a powerful man as a born leader and a powerful woman as an anomaly."
- Margaret Atwood
And who could forget the letters between Abigail Adams and her husband John:
"I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors.
"Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands.
"Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.
"That your sex are naturally tyrannical is a truth so thoroughly established as to admit of no dispute; but such of you as wish to be happy willingly give up -- the harsh tide of master for the more tender and endearing one of friend.
"Why, then, not put it out of the power of the vicious and the lawless to use us with cruelty and indignity with impunity?
"Men of sense in all ages abhor those customs which treat us only as the (servants) of your sex; regard us then as being placed by Providence under your protection, and in imitation of the Supreme Being make use of that power only for our happiness."
- Abigail Adams, March 31, 1776
It took more than 144 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence for women to gain the right to vote. By that time the power structure in this country was well established.
Women have only had the right to vote for 88 years (roughly two generations), so there is a bit of catching up we still need to do.
Surely you have seen the power dynamics at work during the last seven years of the Bush administration. All the no-bid contracts awarded to Halliburton. The good-old-boy network has given them trillions of dollars. So much so that they actually LOST about 12 billion and no one in government seems to care?
When the deck is so stacked against you it can be difficult to break through.
Is it happening? Yes. At the same rate as incompetent men are being promoted in the corporate world and in politics? No.
We have an admitted "C" student as President of the United States. Did he get there because he earned it -- was he the "best and brightest"? No, he got there because the good-old-boy network gave it to him.
How many times in the corporate arena have women trained the men who then become their boss? OFTEN.
The irony in the corporate arena is that women owned business tend to be far more successful than businesses started by men. The failure rate for new business start-up is around 80%, but new businesses started by women tend to succeed at a rate of around 80%. I think it's because we are so used to delayed gratification.
When you factor in the violence that far too many women face, it's amazing we (as a group) have achieved as much as we already have.
A harsh reality that men should face is that you guys have really fucked things up. You are destroying the planet and each other. The problem is that many of you can't see past the end of your nose. And sadly, we are ALL going to pay for it.
And if you had any awareness you would be able to see that if Obama were "Brenda" instead of "Barack" he would be out of the contest by now.
BAC
Post a Comment