Friday, April 25, 2008

No Justice for Sean Bell

Sean Bell was celebrating with friends the night before he was to be married. It was a bachelor party turned tragic when in the wee hours of the morning -- on his wedding day -- Bell was killed as police officers fired 50 shots at the unarmed man.

The three officers on trial for the shooting were acquitted of all charges today. This simply cannot be justice.

Three detectives were acquitted of all charges Friday in the 50-shot killing of an unarmed groom-to-be on his wedding day, a case that put the NYPD at the center of another dispute involving allegations of excessive firepower.

Justice Arthur Cooperman delivered the verdict in a Queens courtroom packed with spectators, including victim Sean Bell's fiancee and parents, as at least 200 people gathered outside the building. [...]

The officers, complaining that pretrial publicity had unfairly painted them as cold-blooded killers, opted to have the judge decide the case rather than a jury.

Officers Michael Oliver, 36, and Gescard Isnora, 29, stood trial for manslaughter while Officer Marc Cooper, 40, was charged only with reckless endangerment. Two other shooters weren't charged. Oliver squeezed off 31 shots; Isnora fired 11 rounds; and Cooper shot four times.

A conviction on manslaughter could have brought up to 25 years in prison; the penalty for reckless endangerment, a misdemeanor, is a year behind bars.

The case brought back painful memories of other NYPD shootings, such as the 1999 shooting of Amadou Diallo — an African immigrant who was gunned down in a hail of 41 bullets by police officers who mistook his wallet for a gun. The acquittal of the officers in that case created a storm of protest, with hundreds arrested after taking to the streets in demonstration.
Pictured above is Sean Bell with his fiancee Nicole Paultre and their daughter.


Previously:
Coast to Coast Racism
November 26, 2006

3 comments:

BAC said...

I absolutely agree. There is no justice here.


BAC

Mary Ellen said...

For the life of me, I can't figure out how they excuse squeezing off that many rounds into a guy, by multiple officers, no less! What did they think he was going to do with that many bullets in him? It's not like he was holding a gun and pointing it at him, and I can imagine he was trying to get them to stop and showing he didn't have a weapon.

But that's the way it always is, the police will always be given the benefit of the doubt. I can see shooting at him once, tops, and then seeing if he would put up his hands and surrender. This was just a blood bath.

dmarks said...

Maybe some sort of locking system that limits NYC police to firing one bullet every two hours is in order now.

Sheesh.